Monday, May 21, 2012
 

Insider Technologies software house is based in Salford Quays, Greater Manchester and is located close to the Peel MediaCityUK BBC North development. Insider Technologies (ITL) have been designing, developing, testing and maintaining HP NonStop (Tandem) application software since 1989 (including TAL, pTAL, TACL macros, BASE24 XPNET, COBOL85, C, C++, NonStop SQL, SCOBOL programming and outsource application development on ServerNet Integrity Itanium Blades). This even includes our own HP NonStop Tandem products.

Subscribe to the free Insider Technologies Limited newsletter

 

ITL are a ISO 9001:2008 and TickIT Quality Certified company based in Manchester, UK


 

 



Save as PDF!

Livestock Registration and Management Database

 


Insider Technologies have developed a bovine identification and traceability system that complies with the requirements outlined in EC regulation 1760/2000. The software uses the ASP.NET framework and records required tagging and cattle data to a normalised Microsoft SQL databaseInsider Technologies have developed a cattle tracking, identification and traceability system that complies with the requirements outlined in EC regulation 1760/2000
. The software uses the ASP.NET framework and records required tagging and cattle data to a normalised Microsoft SQL database.



  • Overview
  • Screens
  • Benefits
  • Demo
  • Requires


 

Company brochure
Minimize


Insider Technologies Company Brochure - the architects behind RTLX - ATM, POS, XML, Retailer, Merchant, Payment, Transaction, BASE24, TLF, PTLF, EMAIL monitoringView our Company Brochure

Download our Company Brochure (2.8MB - PDF) and find out more about Insider Technologies - the team behind RTLX REACTOR.



Cattle and Buffalo Identification and Traceability System - Tracking Summary Report
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Cattle & Buffalo Identification & Traceability System - Property Registration
Cattle & Buffalo Identification & Traceability System - Cattle Registration
Cattle & Buffalo Identification & Traceability System - Cattle Movements
Cattle & Buffalo Identification & Traceability System - Tag Ordering
Cattle & Buffalo Identification & Traceability System - Cattle Management
Livestock movements, identification and tracing: cattle - tagging
An Ear tag is a plastic or metal object

Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council

of 17 July 2000

establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97


THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 37 and 152 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission(1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions(3),

Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty(4),

Whereas:

  • (1) Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products(5), states that a compulsory beef labelling system is to be introduced and obligatory in all Member States from 1 January 2000 onwards. The same Article also provides that, on the basis of a Commission proposal, the general rules for that compulsory system are to be adopted before that date.
  • (2) Council Regulation (EC) No 2772/1999 of 21 December 1999 providing for the general rules for a compulsory beef labelling system(6) provides for these general rules to apply only temporarily for a maximum period of eight months, that is to say from 1 February to 31 August 2000.
  • (3) For the sake of clarity Regulation (EC) No 820/97 should be repealed and replaced by this Regulation.
  • (4) Following the instability in the market in beef and beef products caused by the bovine spongiform encephalopathy crisis, the improvement in the transparency of the conditions for the production and marketing of the products concerned, particularly as regards traceability, has exerted a positive influence on consumption of beef. In order to maintain and strengthen the confidence of consumers in beef and to avoid misleading them, it is necessary to develop the framework in which the information is made available to consumers by sufficient and clear labelling of the product.
  • (5) To that end it is essential to establish, on the one hand, an efficient system for the identification and registration of bovine animals at the production stage and to create, on the other hand, a specific Community labelling system in the beef sector based on objective criteria at the marketing stage.
  • (6) By virtue of the guarantees provided through this improvement, certain public interest requirements will also be attained, in particular the protection of human and animal health.
  • (7) As a result, consumer confidence in the quality of beef and beef products will be improved, a higher level of protection of public health preserved and the lasting stability of the beef market will be reinforced.
  • (8) Article 3(1)(c) of Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(7) states that animals for intra-Community trade must be identified in accordance with the requirements of Community rules and be registered in such a way that the original or transit holding, centre or organisation can be traced, and that before 1 January 1993 these identification and registration systems are to be extended to the movements of animals within the territory of each Member State.
  • (9) Article 14 of Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(8) states that the identification and registration as provided for in Article 3(1)(c) of Directive 90/425/EEC of such animals must, except in the case of animals for slaughter and registered equidae, be carried out after the said checks have been made.
  • (10) The management of certain Community aid schemes in the field of agriculture requires the individual identification of certain types of livestock. The identification and registration systems must, therefore, be suitable for the application and control of such individual identification measures.
  • (11) It is necessary to ensure the rapid and efficient exchange of information between Member States for the correct application of this Regulation. Community provisions relating thereto have been established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1468/81 of 19 May 1981 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and the cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs or agriculture matters(9) and by Council Directive 89/608/EEC of 21 November 1989 on mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of legislation on veterinary and zootechnical matters(10).
  • (12) The current rules concerning the identification and the registration of bovine animals have been laid down in Council Directive 92/102/EEC of 27 November 1992 on the identification and registration of animals(11) and Regulation (EC) No 820/97. Experience has shown that the implementation of Directive 92/102/EEC for bovine animals has not been entirely satisfactory and needs further improvement. It is therefore necessary to adopt specific rules for bovine animals in order to reinforce the provisions of the said Directive.
  • (13) For the introduction of an improved identification system to be accepted, it is essential not to impose excessive demands on the producer in terms of administrative formalities. Feasible time limits for its implementation must be laid down.
  • (14) For the purpose of rapid and accurate tracing of animals for reasons relating to the control of Community aid schemes, each Member State should create a national computerised data base which will record the identity of the animal, all holdings on its territory and the movements of the animals, in accordance with the provisions of Council Directive 97/12/EC of 17 March 1997 amending and updating Directive 64/432/EEC on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine(12), which clarifies the health requirements concerning this database.
  • (15) It is important that each Member State take all measures that may still be necessary in order to ensure that the national computerised database is fully operational as quickly as possible.
  • (16) Steps should be taken in order to create the technical conditions guaranteeing the best communication possible by the producer with the database and a comprehensive use of databases.
  • (17) In order to permit movements of bovine animals to be traced, animals should be identified by an ear tag applied in each ear and in principle accompanied by a passport throughout any movement. The characteristics of the ear tag and of the passport should be determined on a Community basis. In principle a passport should be issued for each animal to which an ear tag has been allocated.
  • (18) Animals imported from third countries pursuant to Directive 91/496/EEC should be subject to the same identification requirements.
  • (19) Every animal should keep its ear tag throughout its life.
  • (20) The Commission is examining, on the basis of work performed by the Joint Research Centre, the feasibility of using electronic means for the identification of animals.
  • (21) Keepers of animals, with the exception of transporters, should maintain an up-to-date register of the animals on their holdings. The characteristics of the register should be determined on a Community basis. The competent authority should have access to these registers on request.
  • (22) Member States may spread the costs arising from the application of these measures over the entire beef sector.
  • (23) The authority or authorities responsible for the application of each title in this Regulation should be designated.
  • (24) A compulsory beef labelling system should be introduced which is obligatory in all Member States. Under this compulsory system, operators and organisations marketing beef should indicate on the label information about the beef and the point of slaughter of the animal or animals from which that beef was derived.
  • (25) The compulsory beef labelling system should be reinforced from 1 January 2002. Under this compulsory system, operators and organisations marketing beef should, in addition, indicate on the label information concerning origin, in particular where the animal or animals from which the beef was derived were born, fattened and slaughtered.
  • (26) Information additional to the information concerning where the animal or animals from which the beef was derived were born, fattened and slaughtered may be provided under the voluntary beef labelling system.
  • (27) The system of compulsory labelling based on origin should be in force from 1 January 2002, it being understood that full information on movements made by bovine animals in the Community is only required for animals born after 31 December 1997.
  • (28) The compulsory beef labelling system should also apply to beef imported into the Community. However, provision should be made for the fact that not all the information which is required for labelling beef produced in the Community may be available to a third-country operator or organisation. It is therefore necessary to state the minimum information that third countries must ensure is indicated on the label.
  • (29) For operators or organisations producing and marketing minced beef who may not be in a position to provide all the information required under the compulsory beef labelling system, exceptions ensuring a certain minimum number of indications must be provided.
  • (30) The objective of labelling is to give maximum transparency in the marketing of beef.
  • (31) The provisions of this Regulation must not affect Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(13).
  • (32) For all indications other than those falling under the compulsory beef labelling system, a Community framework for labelling of beef should also be provided and, in view of the diversity of descriptions of beef marketed in the Community, the establishment of a voluntary beef labelling system is the most appropriate solution. The effectiveness of such a voluntary labelling system depends on the possibility of tracing any labelled beef back to the animal or animals of origin. The labelling arrangements of an operator or organisation should be subject to a specification to be submitted to the competent authority for approval. Operators and organisations should be entitled to label beef only if the label contains their name or their identifying logo. The competent authorities of the Member States should be authorised to withdraw their approval of any specification in the event of irregularities. In order to ensure that labelling specifications may be recognised across the Community, it is necessary to provide for the exchange of information between Member States.
  • (33) Operators and organisations importing into the Community beef from third countries may also wish to label their products according to the voluntary labelling system. Provisions should be laid down to ensure as far as possible that labelling arrangements relating to imported beef are of equivalent reliability to those set up for Community beef.
  • (34) The change from the arrangements in Title II of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 to those in this Regulation can give rise to difficulties that are not dealt with in this Regulation. In order to deal with that possibility, provision should be made for the Commission to adopt the necessary transitional measures. The Commission should also be authorised to solve specific practical problems where justified.
  • (35) With a view to guaranteeing the reliability of the arrangements provided for by this Regulation, it is necessary to oblige the Member States to carry out adequate and efficient control measures. These controls should be without prejudice to any controls that the Commission may carry out by analogy with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests(14).
  • (36) Appropriate penalties should be laid down in the event of a breach of the provisions of this Regulation.
  • (37) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission(15),

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:


TITLE I

Identification and registration of bovine animals

Article 1

1. Each Member State shall establish a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals, in accordance with this Title.

2. The provisions of this title shall apply without prejudice to Community rules which may be established for disease eradication or control purposes and without prejudice to Directive 91/496/EEC and Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92(16). However, the provisions of Directive 92/102/EEC which relate specifically to bovine animals shall no longer apply from the date on which those animals must be identified in accordance with this title.


Article 2

For the purposes of this title:

- "animal" means a bovine animal within the meaning of Article 2(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 64/432/EEC(17),

- "holding" means any establishment, construction or, in the case of an open-air farm, any place situated within the territory of the same Member State, in which animals covered by this Regulation are held, kept or handled,

- "keeper" means any natural or legal person responsible for animals, whether on a permanent or on a temporary basis, including during transportation or at a market,

- "competent authority" means the central authority or authorities in a Member State responsible for, or entrusted with, carrying out veterinary checks and implementing this title or, in the case of the monitoring of premiums, the authorities entrusted with implementing Regulation (EC) No 3508/92.


Article 3

The system for the identification and registration of bovine animals shall comprise the following elements:

(a) ear tags to identify animals individually;

(b) computerised databases;

(c) animal passports;

(d) individual registers kept on each holding.

The Commission and the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall have access to all the information covered by this title. The Member States and the Commission shall take the measures necessary to ensure access to these data for all parties concerned, including consumer organisations having an interest which are recognised by the Member State, provided that the data confidentiality and protection prescribed by national law are ensured.


Article 4

1. All animals on a holding born after 31 December 1997 or intended for intra-Community trade after 1 January 1998 shall be identified by an ear tag approved by the competent authority, applied to each ear. Both ear tags shall bear the same unique identification code, which makes it possible to identify each animal individually together with the holding on which it was born. By way of derogation from the above requirement, animals born before 1 January 1998 which are intended for intra-Community trade after that date may be identified in accordance with Directive 92/102/EEC until 1 September 1998.

By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, animals born before 1 January 1998 which are intended for intra-Community trade after that date with a view to immediate slaughter may be identified in accordance with Directive 92/102/EEC until 1 September 1999.

Bovine animals intended for cultural and sporting events (with the exception of fairs and exhibitions) may, instead of by an ear tag, be identified by an identification system offering equivalent guarantees and authorised by the Commission.

2. The ear tag shall be applied within a period to be determined by the Member State as from the birth of the animal and in any case before the animal leaves the holding on which it was born. The period may not be longer than 30 days up to and including 31 December 1999, and not longer than 20 days thereafter.

However, at the request of a Member State and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), the Commission may determine the circumstances in which Member States may extend the maximum period.

No animal born after 31 December 1997 may be moved from a holding unless it is identified in accordance with the provisions of this Article.

3. Any animal imported from a third country which has passed the checks laid down in Directive 91/496/EEC and which remains within Community territory shall be identified on the holding of destination by an ear tag complying with the requirements of this Article, within a period to be determined by the Member State but not exceeding 20 days following the aforesaid checks, and in any event before leaving the holding.

However, it is not necessary to identify the animal if the holding of destination is a slaughterhouse situated in the Member State where such checks are carried out and the animal is slaughtered within 20 days of undergoing the checks.

The original identification established by the third country shall be recorded in the computerised database provided for in Article 5 or, if this is not yet fully operational, in the registers provided for in Article 3, together with the identification code allocated to it by the Member State of destination.

4. Any animal from another Member State shall retain its original ear tag.

5. No ear tag may be removed or replaced without the permission of the competent authority.

6. The ear tags shall be allocated to the holding, distributed and applied to the animals in a manner determined by the competent authority.

7. Not later than 31 December 2001 the European Parliament and the Council, acting on the basis of a report from the Commission accompanied by any proposals and in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 95 of the Treaty, shall decide on the possibility of introducing electronic identification arrangements in the light of progress achieved in this field.


Article 5

The competent authority of the Member States shall set up a computerised database in accordance with Articles 14 and 18 of Directive 64/432/EC.

The computerised databases shall become fully operational no later than 31 December 1999, after which they shall store all data required pursuant to the said Directive.


Article 6

1. As from 1 January 1998, the competent authority shall, for each animal which has to be identified in accordance with Article 4, issue a passport within 14 days of the notification of its birth, or, in the case of animals imported from third countries, within 14 days of the notification of its re-identification by the Member State concerned in accordance with Article 4(3). The competent authority may issue a passport for animals from another Member State under the same conditions. In such cases, the passport accompanying the animal on its arrival shall be surrendered to the competent authority, which shall return it to the issuing Member State.

However, at the request of a Member State and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), the Commission may determine the circumstances under which the maximum period may be extended.

2. Whenever an animal is moved, it shall be accompanied by its passport.

3. By way of derogation from the first sentence of paragraph 1 and from paragraph 2, Member States:

- which have a computerised database which the Commission deems to be fully operational in accordance with Article 5 may determine that a passport is to be issued only for animals intended for intra-Community trade and that those animals shall be accompanied by their passports only when they are moved from the territory of the Member State concerned to the territory of another Member State, in which case the passport shall contain information based on the computerised database.

In these Member States, the passport accompanying an animal imported from another Member State shall be surrendered to the competent authority on its arrival;

- may until 1 January 2000 authorise the issue of collective animal passports for herds moved within the Member State concerned provided that such herds have the same origin and destination and are accompanied by a veterinary certificate.

4. In the case of the death of an animal, the passport shall be returned by the keeper to the competent authority within seven days after the death of the animal. If the animal is sent to the slaughterhouse, the operator of the slaughterhouse shall be responsible for returning the passport to the competent authority.

5. In the case of animals exported to third countries, the passport shall be surrendered by the last keeper to the competent authority at the place where the animal is exported.


Article 7

1. With the exception of transporters, each keeper of animals shall:

- keep an up-to-date register,

- once the computerised database is fully operational, report to the competent authority all movements to and from the holding and all births and deaths of animals on the holding, along with the dates of these events, within a period fixed by the Member State of between three and seven days of the event occurring. However, at the request of a Member State and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), the Commission may determine the circumstances in which Member States may extend the maximum period and provide for special rules applicable to movements of bovine animals when put out to summer grazing in different mountain areas.

2. Where applicable and having regard to Article 6, each animal keeper shall complete the passport immediately on arrival and prior to departure of each animal from the holding and ensure that the passport accompanies the animal.

3. Each keeper shall supply the competent authority, upon request, with all information concerning the origin, identification and, where appropriate, destination of animals, which he has owned, kept, transported, marketed or slaughtered.

4. The register shall be in a format approved by the competent authority, kept in manual or computerised form, and be available at all times to the competent authority, upon request, for a minimum period to be determined by the competent authority but which may not be less than three years.


Article 8

Member States shall designate the authority responsible for ensuring compliance with this title. They shall inform each other and the Commission of the identity of this authority.


Article 9

Member States may charge to keepers the costs of the systems referred to in Article 3 and of the controls referred to in this title.


Article 10

The measures necessary for the implementation of this Title shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 23(2). These measures concern in particular:

(a) provisions concerning ear tags;

(b) provisions concerning the passport;

(c) provisions concerning the register;

(d) minimum level of controls to be carried out;

(e) application of administrative sanctions;

(f) transitional measures required to facilitate the application of this title.


TITLE II

Labelling of beef and beef products

Article 11

An operator or an organisation, as defined in Article 12, which:

- is required, by virtue of Section I of this title, to label beef at all stages of marketing,

- wishes, by virtue of Section II of this title, to label beef at the point of sale in such a way as to provide information, other than that laid down by Article 13, concerning certain characteristics or production conditions of the labelled meat or of the animal from which it derives,

shall do so in accordance with this title.

This title shall apply without prejudice to relevant Community legislation, in particular on beef.


Article 12

For the purposes of this title, the following definitions shall apply:

- "beef" means all products falling within CN codes 0201, 0202, 0206 10 95 and 0206 29 91,

- "labelling" means the attachment of a label to an individual piece or pieces of meat or to their packaging material, or in the case of non-prewrapped products the supply of appropriate information in written and visible form to the consumer at the point of sale,

- "organisation" means a group of operators from the same or different parts of the beef trade.


SECTION I

Compulsory Community beef labelling system

Article 13

General rules

1. Operators and organisations marketing beef in the Community shall label it in accordance with this Article.

The compulsory labelling system shall ensure a link between, on the one hand, the identification of the carcass, quarter or pieces of meat and, on the other hand, the individual animal or, where this is sufficient to enable the accuracy of the information on the label to be checked, the group of animals concerned.

2. The label shall contain the following indications:

(a) a reference number or reference code ensuring the link between the meat and the animal or animals. This number may be the identification number of the individual animal from which the beef was derived or the identification number relating to a group of animals;

(b) the approval number of the slaughterhouse at which the animal or group of animals was slaughtered and the Member State or third country in which the slaughterhouse is established. The indication shall read: "Slaughtered in (name of the Member State or third country) (approval number)";

(c) the approval number of the cutting hall which performed the cutting operation on the carcass or group of carcases and the Member State or third country in which the hall is established. The indication shall read: "Cutting in: (name of the Member State or third country) (approval number)".

3. However, up until 31 December 2001, Member States where sufficient details are available in the identification and registration system for bovine animals, provided for in Title I, may decide that, for beef from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the same Member State, supplementary items of information must also be indicated on labels.

4. A compulsory system as provided for in paragraph 3 must not lead to any disruption of trade between the Member States.

The implementation arrangements applicable in those Member States intending to apply paragraph 3 shall require prior approval from the Commission.

5. (a) As from 1 January 2002, operators and organisations shall also indicate on the labels:

(i) Member State or third country of birth;

(ii) all Member States or third countries where fattening took place;

(iii) Member State or third country where slaughter took place;

(b) However, where the beef is derived from animals born, raised and slaughtered:

(i) in the same Member State, the indication may be given as "Origin: (name of Member State)";

(ii) in the same third country, the indication may be given as "Origin: (name of third country)".


Article 14

Derogations from the compulsory labelling system

By way of derogation from Article 13(2)(b) and (c) and from Article 13(5)(a)(i) and (ii), an operator or organisation preparing minced beef shall indicate on the label the words "prepared (name of the Member State or third country)", depending on where the meat was prepared, and "origin" where the State or States involved are not the State of preparation.

The obligation provided for in Article 13(5)(a)(iii) shall be applicable to such meat as from the date of application of this Regulation.

However, such operator or organisation may add to the label of the minced beef:

- one or more of the indications provided for in Article 13, and/or

- the date on which the meat was prepared.

On the basis of experience, and in the light of requirements, similar provisions may be adopted for cut meat and for beef trimmings in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2).


Article 15

Compulsory labelling of beef from third countries

By way of derogation from Article 13, beef imported into the Community for which not all the information provided for in Article 13 is available, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 17, shall be labelled with the indication: "Origin: non-EC" and "Slaughtered in: (name of third country)".


SECTION II

Voluntary labelling system

Article 16

General rules

1. For labels containing indications other than those provided for in Section I of this title, each operator or organisation shall send a specification for approval to the competent authority of the Member State in which production or sale of the beef in question takes place. The competent authority may also establish specifications to be used in the Member State concerned, provided that use thereof is not compulsory.

Voluntary labelling specifications shall indicate:

- the information to be included on the label,

- the measures to be taken to ensure the accuracy of the information,

- the control system which will be applied at all stages of production and sale, including the controls to be carried out by an independent body recognised by the competent authority and designated by the operator or the organisation. These bodies shall comply with the criteria set out in European Standard EN/45011,

- in the case of an organisation, the measures to be taken in relation to any member which fails to comply with the specifications.

Member States may decide that controls by an independent body may be replaced by controls by a competent authority. The competent authority shall in that case have at its disposal the qualified staff and resources necessary to carry out the requisite controls.

The costs of controls provided for in this section shall be borne by the operator or organisation using the labelling system.

2. The approval of any specification shall be subject to the assurance of the competent authority, obtained on the basis of a thorough examination of its components as referred to in paragraph 1, of the proper and reliable functioning of the labelling system envisaged and, in particular, of any specification which does not ensure a link between, on the one hand, the identification of the carcass, quarter or pieces of meat and, on the other hand, the individual animal or, where this is sufficient to enable the accuracy of the information on the label to be checked, the animals concerned.

Specifications which provide for labels containing misleading or insufficiently clear information shall also be refused.

3. Where the production and/or sale of beef takes place in two or more Member States, the competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall examine and approve the specifications submitted in so far as the elements contained therein relate to operations taking place within their respective territories. In such case, each Member State concerned shall recognise the approvals granted by any other Member State concerned.

If, within a period to be fixed in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), counting from the day following the date of submission of the application, approval has not been refused or given, or supplementary information has not been asked for, the specification shall be considered to be approved by the competent authority.

4. Where the competent authorities of all the Member States concerned approve the specification submitted, the operator or organisation concerned shall be entitled to label beef, provided that the label contains its name or logo.

5. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 4, the Commission, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), may provide for an accelerated or simplified procedure for approval in specific cases, in particular for beef in small retail packages or prime beef cuts in individual packages, labelled in a Member State according to an approved specification and introduced into the territory of another Member State, provided that no information is added to the initial label.

6. A Member State may decide that the name of one or more of its regions may not be used, in particular where the name of a region:

- could give rise to confusion or difficulties in checking,

- is reserved for beef in the framework of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.

Where authorisation is given, the name of the Member State shall appear alongside the name of the region.

7. Member States shall inform the Commission of the implementation of this Article and in particular of the indications set out on the labels. The Commission shall inform the other Member States within the Management Committee for Beef and Veal referred to in Article 23(1)(b) and, where necessary, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(2), rules relating to those indications may be laid down and, in particular, limits may be imposed.


Article 17

Voluntary labelling system for beef from third countries

1. Where the production of beef takes place, in full or in part, in a third country, operators and organisations shall be entitled to label beef according to this section if, in addition to complying with Article 16, they have obtained for their specifications the approval of the competent authority designated for that purpose by each of the third countries concerned.

2. The validity within the Community of an approval granted by a third country shall be subject to prior notification by the third country to the Commission of:

- the competent authority which has been designated,

- the procedures and criteria to be followed by the competent authority when examining the specification,

- each operator and organisation whose specification was accepted by the competent authority.

The Commission shall transmit these notifications to the Member States.

Where, on the basis of the above notifications, the Commission reaches the conclusion that the procedures and/or criteria applied in a third country are not equivalent to the standards set out in this Regulation, the Commission shall, after consultation with the third country concerned, decide that approvals granted by that third country shall not be valid within the Community.


Article 18

Sanctions

Without prejudice to any action taken by the organisation itself or the independent control body provided for in Article 16, where it is shown that an operator or organisation has failed to comply with the specification referred to in Article 16(1), the Member State may withdraw the approval provided for in Article 16(2) or impose supplementary conditions to be respected if its approval is to be maintained.


SECTION III

General provisions

Article 19

Detailed rules

The measures necessary for the implementation of this title shall be adopted in accordance with the management procedure referred to in Article 23(2). These measures concern in particular:

(a) definition of the size of the group of animals, referred to in Article 13(2)(a);

(b) definition of the minced beef, beef trimmings or cut beef referred to in Article 14;

(c) definition of specific indications that may be put on labels;

(d) measures required to facilitate the transition from the application of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 to application of this title;

(e) measures required to resolve specific practical problems. Such measures, if duly justified, may derogate from certain parts of this title.


Article 20

Designation of competent authorities

Member States shall designate the competent authority or authorities responsible for implementing this title, no later than 14 October 2000.


Article 21

At the latest by 14 August 2003, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, together, if necessary, with appropriate proposals regarding extending the scope of this Regulation to processed products containing beef and beef-based products.


TITLE III

Common provisions

Article 22

1. Member States shall take all the necessary measures to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Regulation. The controls provided for shall be without prejudice to any controls which the Commission may carry out pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95.

Any sanctions imposed by the Member State on a holder shall be proportionate to the gravity of the breach. The sanctions may involve, where justified, a restriction on movement of animals to or from the holding of the keeper concerned.

2. Experts from the Commission, in conjunction with the competent authorities:

(a) shall verify that the Member States are complying with the requirements of this Regulation;

(b) shall make on-the-spot checks to ensure that the checks are carried out in accordance with this Regulation.

3. A Member State in whose territory an on-the-spot check is made shall provide the experts from the Commission with any assistance they may require in the performance of their tasks.

The outcome of the checks made must be discussed with the competent authority of the Member State concerned before a final report is drawn up and circulated.

4. Where the Commission deems that the outcome of checks so justifies, it shall review the situation within the Standing Veterinary Committee referred to in Article 23(1)(c). It may adopt the necessary decisions in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23(3).

5. The Commission shall monitor developments in the situation: in the light of such developments and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23(3) it may amend or repeal the decisions referred to in paragraph 4.

6. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, where necessary, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 23(3).


Article 23

1. The Commission shall be assisted:

(a) for the implementation of Article 10, by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund Committee referred to in Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999(18);

(b) for the implementation of Article 19 by the Management Committee for Beef and Veal set up by Article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999(19);

(c) for the implementation of Article 22 by the Standing Veterinary Committee set up by Council Decision 68/361/EEC(20).

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period referred to in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at one month.

3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period referred to in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.

4. The Committees shall adopt their rules of procedure.


Article 24

1. Regulation (EC) No 820/97 shall be repealed.

2. References to Regulation (EC) No 820/97 shall be construed as references to this Regulation and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table set out in the Annex.


Article 25

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall be applicable to beef from animals slaughtered on or after 1 September 2000.


This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2000.


For the European Parliament

The President

N. Fontaine


For the Council

The President

J. Glavany


(1) OJ C 376 E, 28.12.1999, p. 42.

(2) OJ C 117, 26.4.2000, p. 47.

(3) OJ C 226, 8.8.2000, p. 9.

(4) European Parliament opinion of 12 April 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal), Council Common Position of 6 June 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and European Parliament Decision of 6 July 2000 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(5) OJ L 117, 7.5.1997, p. 1.

(6) OJ L 334, 28.12.1999, p. 1.

(7) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49).

(8) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 56. Directive as last amended by Directive 96/43/EC (OJ 162, 1.7.1996, p. 1).

(9) OJ L 144, 2.6.1981, p. 1. Regulation repealed by Regulation (EC) No 515/97 (OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, p. 1).

(10) OJ L 351, 2.12.1989, p. 34.

(11) OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 32. Directive as last amended by the 1994 Act of Accession.

(12) OJ L 109, 25.4.1997, p. 1.

(13) OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1.

(14) OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1036/1999 (OJ L 127, 21.5.1999, p. 4).

(15) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

(16) OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1036/1999 (OJ L 127, 21.5.1999, p. 4).

(17) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64. Directive updated by Directive 97/12/EC (OJ L 109, 25.4.1997, p. 1 ) and last amended by Directive 98/99/EC (OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 107).

(18) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(19) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21.

(20) OJ L 255, 18.10.1968, p. 23.

 

Livestock movements, identification and tracing: cattle - tagging


Cattle born after 1 January 1998 must have a Defra approved eartag in each ear (double tagging). The tag in each ear must have the same unique number. Such animals will be identified throughout their lifetime by this unique number. Animals born in or imported into Great Britain before 1 January 1998 may continue to be identified by a single tag. Cattle born after 1 July 2000 must be identified by all numeric tags.

When to tag


All cattle must be tagged with an approved eartag in each ear within 20 days of birth. In the case of dairy animals, at least one of the tags must be fitted within 36 hours of birth. You are allowed up to 20 days from the calf’s birth to fit the second tag.

You must fit both tags before an animal moves off the holding where it was born, even if that is before it is 20 days old. The only exception to this is in the case of bison. Bison are allowed to be tagged up to nine months after birth.

Tagging requirements
The tags used for double tagging are known as the primary and secondary tag.

The "primary" tag, which may be inserted in either ear, must be made of yellow plastic and be at least 45 mm from top to bottom and at least 55 mm wide. The characters must be a minimum of 5 mm high. The primary tag must bear the symbol of a crown (the GB logo), the letters UK and the unique lifetime identification number
The "secondary" tag may be of a range of approved materials and models, including metal, plastic "button" type and other plastic type. It must contain the same information as the primary tag, but may also contain management information. The secondary tag must be in a different ear from the primary tag
Since 1 April 1998 only yellow primary tags have been produced. All new-born animals must be identified by these yellow primary tags
The secondary tag may contain a microchip to allow electronic identification of the animal. However, it is the number on the outside of the tag that is the official number. The microchip is not part of the official requirements
Ordering eartags
Farmers must order eartags from one of the manufacturers which supply Defra approved eartags. The manufacturer will notify the Government’s computerised Eartag Allocation System (ETAS) of the farmer’s order and will be allocated sequential numbers for each tag ordered using the farmer’s individual herd mark and cross referencing to the unique farm address code (CPH). This process ensures that tags cannot be duplicated.

Under European Community rules that became effective on 1 October 1998, keepers may only be authorised to obtain a maximum of one year's supply of eartags. Keepers should therefore limit their orders for approved eartags to one year's supply.

Model of eartag used for identification of bovine animals
How to tag
Eartag manufacturers will provide farmers with instructions on how to apply their tags. Farmers should ensure they are using the correct applicator for their tags. You should contact your eartag supplier for further information.

If the eartag appears to be causing any welfare problems you should notify Defra using a Welfare Notification Slip. You should receive this form with all standard eartag orders. Please contact your eartag supplier if you require any further copies.

Farmers should always refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for specific advice on how best to insert their particular brand of eartag. If you have a problem with insertion of a particular tag, please speak to your tag supplier. If the problem cannot be resolved please speak to your local Divisional Veterinary Manager.

Lost or illegible tags
You must replace lost illegible tags as soon as possible, but no later than 28 days after you notice the loss.

Imported animals
Animals imported from other EU Member States will, from 1 September 1998, already be double tagged. (See Regulation (EC) No 1760/00 for detailed rules.) There is no need to retag these animals unless an eartag is lost. Eartag manufacturers can supply replacements for these tags. These replacements will bear the same unique animal ID number, but will replace the original country of origin's logo with the UK crown logo. However, keepers must send BCMS:

any EU passport
an Export Health Certificate
application form CPP16
within 15 days of the animal arriving at the holding.

If the animal is imported from Northern Ireland, the keeper must send BCMS:

a printout from the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Northern Ireland (DARDNI) database, which should be sent from Northern Ireland with the animal
an Export Health Certificate
an application form CPP16
within 15 days of the animal arriving at your holding.

Third country imports
If the animal is imported from outside the European Union, the keeper must:

re-tag it within 20 days of it passing the veterinary checks
apply for a passport within 15 days of tagging using form CPP16
BCMS will issue a chequebook-style passport for all imported animals. The keeper must make sure that they send BCMS all the documents they need within the deadlines or BCMS will apply procedures for late application.

Regulations
The requirements for eartags are set out in Regulations 3-11 of the Cattle Identification Regulations, as amended by regulation 2 of the Cattle Identification (Amendment) Regulations 1998 (see legislation page for details) . The penalties for failing to comply are set out in Regulation 34 and can also be found on the legislation page.

Electronic identification
In 1998 the Commission launched a large scale pilot, called IDEA project
(Identification Electronis des Animaux), to investigate the feasibility of using electronic methods for the identification of all species of animals. The final report was presented in April 2002.

The European Commission concluded that the introduction of electronic identification should be considered in the light of its technical feasibility and its capability to improve the existing system of bovine identification.

The option for this has now been discussed with a majority of the EU Member States supporting a voluntary introduction of electronic identification (EID) for bovines. We are currently waiting for the Commission to decide whether to come forward with legislative proposals.

 

 An Ear tag is a plastic or metal object used for identification of domestic livestock and other animals. If the ear tag contains an RFID module conforming to ISO 11784 & 11785, then it is called an Electronic Ear Tag.

Contents [hide]
1 History
2 Other forms of animal identification
3 References
4 See also
 


An ear tag usually carries an individual identification number or code for the animal, or for its herd or flock. This identification number (ID) may be assigned by some national organisations (usually in the form of Property Identification Code, or PIC),[clarification needed] or they may be handwritten for the convenience of the farmer ("management tags"). The National Livestock Identification System (NLIS) of Australia regulations require that all cattle be fitted with a RFID device in the form of an ear tag or rumen bolus before movement from the property and that the movement be reported to the NLIS. However, if animals are tagged for internal purposes in a herd or farm, IDs need not be unique in larger scales. The NLIS now also requires sheep and goats to use an ear tag that has the Property Identification Code inscribed on it. These ear tags and boluses are complemented by transport documents supplied by vendors that are used for identification and tracking. A similar system is used for cattle in the European Union, each bovine animal having a passport document and tag in each ear carrying the same number. Sheep and goats in the EU have one or two tags carying the official number of their flock (however, individual numbers are to be introduced from the end of 2009).

An ear tag can be applied with an ear tag applicator (also called pliers), however there are also specially-designed tags that can be applied by hand. Depending on the purpose of the tagging, an animal may be tagged on one ear or both. If there exists a national animal identification programme in a country, animals may be tagged on both ears for the sake of increased security and effectiveness, or as a legal requirement.[1][2] If animals are tagged for internal purposes, usually one ear is tagged.[citation needed] Australian sheep and goats are required to have visually readable ear tags printed with a Property Identification Code (PIC). They are complemented by movement documents supplied by consignors that are used for identification and tracking.


[edit] History
 
A sow polar bear with ear tagAlthough ear tags were developed as early as 1913 as a means to identify cattle when testing for tuberculosis, the significant increase of use of ear tags appeared with the outbreak of BSE in UK. Today, ear tags in a variety of designs are used throughout the world on many species of animal to ensure traceability, to help prevent theft[citation needed] and to control disease outbreaks.

The first ear tags were primarily steel with nickel plating. After World War II, larger, flag-like, plastic tags were developed in the United States. Designed to be visible from a distance, these were applied by cutting a slit in the ear and slipping the arrow-shaped head of the tag through it so that the flag would hang from the ear.

In 1953, the first two-piece, self-piercing plastic ear tag was developed and patented. This tag, which combined the easy application of metal tags with the visibility and colour options of plastic tags, also limited the transfer of blood-borne diseases between animals during the application process.

Some cattle ear tags contain chemicals to control insects such as buffalo fly etc. Metal ear tags are used to identify the date of regulation shearing of stud and show sheep. Today, a large number of manufacturers are in competition for the identification of world livestock population.

The United States Department of Agriculture maintains a list of manufacturers approved to sell ear tags in the USA for the National Animal Identification System.

The International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) controls the issue electronic tag numbers.

The National Livestock Identification System (NLIS) is Australia's system for tracing cattle, sheep and goats from birth to slaughter.


[edit] Other forms of animal identification
Pigs, cattle and sheep are frequently earmarked with pliers that notch registered owner and/or age marks into the ear. Mares on large studs have a plastic tag attached to a neck strap for identification. Valuable animals, such as stallions, usually have a brass name plate on their headcollar during transportation. Dairy cows are sometimes identified with ratchet fastened plastic anklets fitted on the pastern for ready inspection during milking.

The National Livestock Identification System (NLIS) Australia, formerly used cattle tail tags for property identification and hormone usage declaration.


[edit] References
^ http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/id-move/cattle/tagging.htm UK cattle tagging.
^ http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/id-move/sheep-goats/pdf/lambbriefing.pdf UK sheep tagging.
Department of Primary Industries
National Livestock Identification System

[edit] See also
Branding iron
Cattle crush
Earmark (agriculture)
National Livestock Identification System
Livestock branding
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear_tag"
 

Livestock movements, identification and tracing: Cattle Tracing System
Cattle tracing is an integral part of the Government’s efforts to improve consumer confidence in British beef. A computerised Cattle Tracing System (CTS) was launched in Great Britain on 28 September 1998. There was already such a system in Northern Ireland. There was a European Union requirement for all EU Member States to have computerised tracing systems by the end of 1999.

What is CTS all about?
The Cattle Tracing System (CTS) is a computer based system to register cattle in Great Britain, and is the fourth element in a comprehensive system of cattle identification and registration. Data relating to where cattle are kept is recorded by the Government so that the animals can be traced for a variety of reasons, including animal disease.

CTS records the identification and death of cattle, the movements from birth to death of cattle issued with passports from 28 September 1998, and the movements of older cattle since 29 January 2001. Cattle keepers can now register new calves, report movements and check information held on their cattle on the CTS through the CTS website.

CTS makes it possible for Defra/BCMS to:

check which animals are present on a holding
check where an animal has been during its life
trace animals exposed to a disease risk
give assurances to buyers about an animal’s life history, and so
strengthen consumer confidence in beef
During the autumn of 2000, an exercise was carried out to register cattle born or imported before 1 July 1996 on CTS and to confirm the location of cattle born between 1 July 1996 and 27 September 1998 (cattle with blue-green passports). This exercise was known as "Cattle Count 2000".

Who runs CTS?
CTS is run the British Cattle Movement Service (BCMS), based in Workington, Cumbria. The BCMS is part of the Department for Environment,Food & Rural Affairs (Defra).

Who pays for CTS?
The Government has paid for setting up the CTS, and for running it during its first  year of operation. This represents a total benefit to the industry of around £36 million. The Government had planned to recover the costs of running the CTS from industry from September 1999. However, in view of the depressed state of the market, the Minister announced on 20 September that the Government would meet the CTS costs itself.

Further information
 

Livestock movements, identification and tracing: cattle - general information on identification and traceability
Cattle are required to be identified with eartags giving them a unique identity within the national herd. Those born since 1 July 1996 must also be accompanied by a cattle passport confirming the identification details – sex, breed, date of birth, identification of the mother – and recording its movement history.

Details of all births, movements between holdings (farms, markets and slaughterhouses) and deaths of individual cattle must be notified as they happen to the central Cattle Tracing System (CTS) computer database run by the British Cattle Movement Service (BCMS) of the Rural Payments Agency (RPA).

Cattle keepers must also keep an up-to-date, accurate herd register of the cattle on their holding, recording identification numbers, breed and sex, dates of births, deaths and movements on and off their farms, together with details of where the cattle came from or went to, and the identification of the mother.

A full and comprehensive guide on the rules for identifying, registering and keeping cattle is contained in the BCMS Cattle Keepers' Handbook.

Paperless registration of pet keepers
There are increasing numbers of people who keep one or two animals as pets, for example pot bellied pigs, who find they need to comply with animal movement legislation and therefore require a CPH number. In the past they have had to go through the same procedure as our other customers to register with us. However this has now changed.

For those customers who are only keeping animals as pets and do not take part in any of the schemes administered by the RPA or for which RPA make payment, registration can be completed over the phone and a CReg 01 will not need to be completed.  This new procedure will start on the 1 August 2008.

The BCMS also operates a dedicated helpline to deal with all queries.


This system provides traceability of cattle from birth to death. It underpins all disease control programmes for cattle, particularly BSE and bovine TB. It provides general assurance for consumers of the provenance of beef and dairy products, and in particular underpins the effectiveness of the BSE testing system in slaughterhouses to prevent infected beef reaching the food chain.

The legislative requirements for cattle identification and traceability are covered on the legislation page.

See also – consultation on review and consolidation of the Cattle Identification Regulations 1998. This consultation has now closed.

How Defra ensures the requirements are being met
Local Authorities and Defra agencies have powers under the Cattle Identification Regulations to take enforcement action against any keepers that do not fully comply.

The Rural Payments Agency, an executive agency for Defra, has responsibility for carrying out cattle identification inspections (CII) to check compliance with the identification and registration requirements.

Local Authority Trading Standards also carry out checks on cattle identification and records in their programme of farm audits and at inspections at markets and of animals in transit.

 

Livestock movements, identification and tracing: cattle - tagging
Cattle born after 1 January 1998 must have a Defra approved eartag in each ear (double tagging). The tag in each ear must have the same unique number. Such animals will be identified throughout their lifetime by this unique number. Animals born in or imported into Great Britain before 1 January 1998 may continue to be identified by a single tag. Cattle born after 1 July 2000 must be identified by all numeric tags.

When to tag
All cattle must be tagged with an approved eartag in each ear within 20 days of birth. In the case of dairy animals, at least one of the tags must be fitted within 36 hours of birth. You are allowed up to 20 days from the calf’s birth to fit the second tag.

You must fit both tags before an animal moves off the holding where it was born, even if that is before it is 20 days old. The only exception to this is in the case of bison. Bison are allowed to be tagged up to nine months after birth.

Tagging requirements
The tags used for double tagging are known as the primary and secondary tag.

The "primary" tag, which may be inserted in either ear, must be made of yellow plastic and be at least 45 mm from top to bottom and at least 55 mm wide. The characters must be a minimum of 5 mm high. The primary tag must bear the symbol of a crown (the GB logo), the letters UK and the unique lifetime identification number
The "secondary" tag may be of a range of approved materials and models, including metal, plastic "button" type and other plastic type. It must contain the same information as the primary tag, but may also contain management information. The secondary tag must be in a different ear from the primary tag
Since 1 April 1998 only yellow primary tags have been produced. All new-born animals must be identified by these yellow primary tags
The secondary tag may contain a microchip to allow electronic identification of the animal. However, it is the number on the outside of the tag that is the official number. The microchip is not part of the official requirements
Ordering eartags
Farmers must order eartags from one of the manufacturers which supply Defra approved eartags. The manufacturer will notify the Government’s computerised Eartag Allocation System (ETAS) of the farmer’s order and will be allocated sequential numbers for each tag ordered using the farmer’s individual herd mark and cross referencing to the unique farm address code (CPH). This process ensures that tags cannot be duplicated.

Under European Community rules that became effective on 1 October 1998, keepers may only be authorised to obtain a maximum of one year's supply of eartags. Keepers should therefore limit their orders for approved eartags to one year's supply.

Model of eartag used for identification of bovine animals
How to tag
Eartag manufacturers will provide farmers with instructions on how to apply their tags. Farmers should ensure they are using the correct applicator for their tags. You should contact your eartag supplier for further information.

If the eartag appears to be causing any welfare problems you should notify Defra using a Welfare Notification Slip. You should receive this form with all standard eartag orders. Please contact your eartag supplier if you require any further copies.

Farmers should always refer to the manufacturer’s instructions for specific advice on how best to insert their particular brand of eartag. If you have a problem with insertion of a particular tag, please speak to your tag supplier. If the problem cannot be resolved please speak to your local Divisional Veterinary Manager.

Lost or illegible tags
You must replace lost illegible tags as soon as possible, but no later than 28 days after you notice the loss.

Imported animals
Animals imported from other EU Member States will, from 1 September 1998, already be double tagged. (See Regulation (EC) No 1760/00 for detailed rules.) There is no need to retag these animals unless an eartag is lost. Eartag manufacturers can supply replacements for these tags. These replacements will bear the same unique animal ID number, but will replace the original country of origin's logo with the UK crown logo. However, keepers must send BCMS:

any EU passport
an Export Health Certificate
application form CPP16
within 15 days of the animal arriving at the holding.

If the animal is imported from Northern Ireland, the keeper must send BCMS:

a printout from the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Northern Ireland (DARDNI) database, which should be sent from Northern Ireland with the animal
an Export Health Certificate
an application form CPP16
within 15 days of the animal arriving at your holding.

Third country imports
If the animal is imported from outside the European Union, the keeper must:

re-tag it within 20 days of it passing the veterinary checks
apply for a passport within 15 days of tagging using form CPP16
BCMS will issue a chequebook-style passport for all imported animals. The keeper must make sure that they send BCMS all the documents they need within the deadlines or BCMS will apply procedures for late application.

Regulations
The requirements for eartags are set out in Regulations 3-11 of the Cattle Identification Regulations, as amended by regulation 2 of the Cattle Identification (Amendment) Regulations 1998 (see legislation page for details) . The penalties for failing to comply are set out in Regulation 34 and can also be found on the legislation page.

Electronic identification
In 1998 the Commission launched a large scale pilot, called IDEA project
(Identification Electronis des Animaux), to investigate the feasibility of using electronic methods for the identification of all species of animals. The final report was presented in April 2002.

The European Commission concluded that the introduction of electronic identification should be considered in the light of its technical feasibility and its capability to improve the existing system of bovine identification.

The option for this has now been discussed with a majority of the EU Member States supporting a voluntary introduction of electronic identification (EID) for bovines. We are currently waiting for the Commission to decide whether to come forward with legislative proposals.

 

When to apply for a passport, and deadline
All cattle born in or imported into Great Britain since 1 July 1996 must have a valid cattle passport. This applies whether the cattle are male, female, dairy or beef.

Passports must accompany the animal in all movements.

All applications for cattle passports must be made to the British Cattle Movement Service (BCMS) within seven days of tagging. This gives all keepers a maximum of 27 days in which to tag and register the birth/apply for a passport.

It is very important that keepers of cattle ensure that passport applications are made within the time limits allowed. Late applications for passports will be refused unless there are exceptional circumstances to consider.

 Top

BCMS Enables Cattle Keepers to Opt Out of receiving Paper Application Forms
After listening to customers who use CTS Online and farm software packages, the British Cattle Movement Service has changed its computer system to allow cattle keepers to no longer receive paper applications forms.

Recent figures for the return of paper application forms have shown a significant drop as more and more keepers choose to use CTS Online and CTS Web services to report births, movements and unregistered deaths of cattle.  Only 30% of calves are now registered using paper, and figures for last year show only 34% of the paper application forms sent out were returned.

Using ‘e’ channels is already a quicker more reliable and accurate way to apply for calf registration, and it is hoped that this move will also provide environmental savings.

Keepers who wish to opt out can e-mail BCMS at ctsonline@bcms.rpa.gsi.gov.uk, or contact their Helpline (English 0845 050 1234, Welsh 0845 050 3456).  BCMS will still be able to send blank forms in an emergency, if for example a keeper is having computer or internet problems.  Keepers can go back to receiving forms at any time upon request.

 Top

Applying for passports
For more information on cattle passports and how to complete an application please refer to the Keepers’ Handbook or visit the BCMS website.

 Top

Why all cattle must have a passport
Cattle passports were introduced in the UK from 1 July 1996 for cattle born or imported from that date to improve cattle identification and traceability. It also formed part of the Government’s strategy to eradicate BSE and to lifting the export ban imposed by the Commission in March 1996.

The passport is a movement document. It enables the movements of individual cattle to be traced throughout their life. Future buyers and inspectors can also see at a glance where an animal has been during its life. This level of traceability is vital to ensure consumer confidence in the safety and origin of their food.

Each passport provides a unique match to the identification and origin of the animal and lists the movements of that particular animal. The passport remains with the animal throughout its life.

 Top

Reasons for the passport deadline
EU Regulations govern the deadlines by which Member States must ensure identification and tracing rules are complied with. Regulations state that birth registration must be made within 7 days of the birth of the animal, or 7 days after the animal has been tagged. GB adopts the latter. Keepers are thereby given the maximum 20 days in which to tag their animals and a further 7 days after to register the birth and apply for a passport. There is no scope to extend the deadline beyond 27 days.

Accurate and early registration provides that every animal arriving at slaughter is the correct age (under 30 months old), is BSE free and therefore fit for human consumption. Without full certainty of the date of birth and the link between calf and mother this would not be possible.

 Top

Cattle without passports
An animal that has been refused a passport may not move from the holding unless under license and only then must go direct to a knackers yard or hunt kennel to be destroyed. Animals without passports may not be slaughtered for home consumption or go into the human food chain under any circumstance.

If you need a licence to move an animal please call the BCMS helpline for a movement licence for cattle.

 Top

Regulations
The requirements for passport application are set out in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 and Regulation 13 of the Cattle Identification Regulations, as amended. Late application procedures are set out in Regulation 13(4). The penalties for failing to comply are set out in Regulation 34 and can also be found in the section on law.

 Top

Implications for markets and abattoirs
Implications for markets
In the case of animals moving through markets with the new style cattle passport, markets are required to complete the movement summary section in the passport and notify the BCMS of a movement through the market. The movement can be notified electronically or by a movement card. In the case of animals moving through markets with the old green cattle passport, the market only needs to complete the movement summary section on the passport.

Implications for abattoirs
In the case of animals moving to abattoirs with the new style cattle passport, the abattoir is required to notify the movement of the animal onto their premises either electronically or using a movement card. They will also need to notify movements of animals leaving their premises if the animals move off without being slaughtered.

Abattoirs only need to complete the movement summary section of either the new style passport or the old style green passport if the animal moves off the premises without being slaughtered .

When animals with the new style cattle passport are slaughtered the slaughterhouse operator must complete the death details in the back of the passport. In the case of animals with the old style green cattle passport, the passport will be stamped at the slaughterhouse to indicate the date and place of slaughter. All cattle passports for slaughtered animals, whether the old or new style, will be returned to the BCMS via the Meat Hygiene Service.

 Top

Export
To ensure traceability is achieved and that cattle can be declared fit for export, animals must be correctly identified as follows:

Eartags to identify animals individually
Cattle passports
Individual on-farm records kept on holdings
Computer database Cattle Tracing System
Further information about the procedures to export is available on the international trade pages
 

Notifying period
Keepers of cattle are legally obliged to notify movements of cattle within 3 days of the event, and the death of an animal within 7 days.

What is a cattle "movement"?
Under the GB system, any movement of an animal comprises an “off” movement followed by an “on” movement.

Presently, keepers are only required to report one half of the movement . So, for example, if an animal leaves a holding the consigning keeper must report the "off" movement, signifying the animal has left the holding. It is the responsibility of the then receiving keeper to report the "on" movement, signifying the animal is now on their holding. Once the movement of an animal is notified to CTS, the database matches it with the other half of the movement and checks they correlate. Any incomplete or incompatible movements are investigated at the British Cattle Movement Service (BCMS).

Cattle moving to from one holding to another, including markets or slaughterhouses, must be accompanied by a valid passport.

top

Types of cattle movements
The following movements of cattle must be reported to BCMS:

On and off farms
To and from markets
To slaughterhouses
If a keeper has previously contacted BCMS and recorded a link between holdings on CTS then the movement of cattle between these holdings does not have to be reported to the BCMS. It must however still be recorded in the herd register.

Failure to report movements
It is an offence for a keeper not to notify BCMS of the movement of any cattle they are responsible for. Movement restrictions can be imposed on cattle if the notification requirements are not complied with.

How are the BCMS to be notified about cattle movements?
There is a choice:

CTS Online
CTS web services
Agent access
Movement cards
top

Sending cattle for slaughter
Cattle may only be slaughtered in approved and licensed slaughterhouses. When they are sending cattle for slaughter, keepers must notify BCMS of the “off” movement from their holding. Cattle going to slaughter must be correctly identified and accompanied by their valid passport. The passport will be checked against the animal’s ear tag number by the abattoir operator prior to and after slaughter.

Animals that are not properly identified cannot be slaughtered for human consumption. Cattle sent to slaughter without the proper identification and valid passport may be destroyed without compensation and without any notification being given.

When the animal has been slaughtered the operator will then enter the details of the death into the back page of the passport and hand to the operator or a representative in the slaughterhouse. They will then return the passport to BCMS to record the animal as dead on CTS.

Cattle dead on holding - cattle under 24 months old
Cattle that die on holding are not permitted to be buried or burned on the holding.

If the animal dies and is less than 24 months of age it can be removed under the National Fallen Stock Scheme. For more information about the scheme call the helpline on 0845 0548888.

Once the carcase has been removed, keepers should enter the death details in the passport and return to BCMS within 7 days of the event. There is no need to report the movement “off” the holding.

top

Cattle dead on holding - cattle over 24 months old
If an animal dies either on the farm or in transit and it is over 24 months of age, it must be sent for BSE testing. Keepers can phone the TSE surveillance helpline on 0800 525890. The keeper must complete the death details in the passport and make sure that any official identification documents go with the animal. There is no need to report the “off” movement.

Cattle without a passport to be slaughtered
Cattle under 24 months of age need to be moved under licence to a hunt kennel or knackers yard. Keepers must apply for a licence from BCMS at least 5 days before they intend to move the animal. Keepers must give the movement licence to the hunt kennel or knackers yard to fill in the slaughter details for them to return to BCMS. There is no need to notify BCMS of the movement “off” the holding.

Cattle over 24 months of age need to be sent for BSE testing in the normal way by calling the transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) surveillance helpline on freephone 0800 525 890 to have the animal taken away for BSE testing and incineration, free of charge. The keeper must ensure that the notice of registration goes with the animal.

Private slaughter
Private slaughter is the killing of an animal by the owner for their personal consumption. Please ring the Food Standards Agency for guidance on 020 7276 8377.

 

Competent authority
Area 5E
9 Millbank
c/o 17 Smith Square
London
SW1P 3JR

Contact: Andrew Beech
Tel: +44 20 7238 5635
Fax: +44 20 7238 6214
E-Mail: andrew.j.beech@defra.gsi.gov.uk

Please note: Address for return of Cattle Passports:

British Cattle Movement Service
Specific duties team
Curwen Road
Workington
CA14 2DD

 Top

Model of eartag used for identification of bovine animals
The main eartag (known in GB as the Primary eartag) is yellow, plastic, two-piece eartag which conforms with Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 262/97 from 1 January 2000 eartags are supplied in the numeric format.

Primary tags

 

Secondary eartag
This eartag can be the same design as the main eartag or an approved alternative.

Management eartag may also be used as a secondary eartag. It may be the same design as the primary eartag but management information concerning the animal may be added to the lower part of the eartag. This eartag may be any colour.

Button eartag area round two-piece, plastic, button design which may be any colour. An example of the button eartag is:

 

Metal eartag area one-piece metal design. An example of a metal eartag is:

 

Barcoded eartag


Council Regulation (EC) No 911/2004 also provides for an option to include a barcode on an official tag. Whilst GB chose not to introduce this requirement, some EU Member States decided to make it compulsory for a barcode to be included on official tags.

Please note there is no requirement for cattle born in GB to be identified with eartags bearing a barcode. This includes animals going for export. It is entirely up to the importer and exporter to decide through commercial arrangement whether or not this is necessary. British eartag manufacturers are permitted to issue such tags as necessary.

 Top

The type of UK eartag numbers
There are some important dates for tagging cattle in the UK. The summary below provides guidance on when calves must be tagged according to the date they were born.

Date of birth Tagging requirements Example of tagging format
1 January 2000 to current (1 July 2000 made compulsory) Ear tag in each ear with the same unique numeric (numbers only) identity for the lifetime of the animal. Includes UK at the beginning. UK666666 500046
1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999 Ear tag in each ear (double-tagging) with the same unique-numeric identity for the lifetime of the animal. Includes UK at the beginning.  UKAB1234 56789
UK A1234 56789
1 April 1995 to 31 December 1997 At least one ear tag with a unique alpha-numeric identity for the lifetime of the animal. Includes UK at the beginning. * UKAB1234 56789
* UK A1234 56789
15 October 1990 to 1 April 1995 Ear tag or tattoo ** A1234 123
** B654 3210
** D123 123C
 

* cattle that have this ear tag format may be exported so long as they are born on or after the 01 August 1996.

** cattle with this ear tag format are born before 01 August 1996 and are therefore NOT eligible for export. Tag format may however appear on the passport as the dam identification.

 Top

Specimen of Passport
Copies of pages from the ‘new style’ passport for Great Britain issued from 28 September 1998. Passports issued from 1 January 2000 may be supplied in the numeric format. Alpha numeric passports continued to be issued until the end of July 2000 when they were replaced by the all numeric style passport.

First page


Movement recording page


Notification to the computer database page


Barcode


 
Herd Record for Bovine Animals
The form for records  (15 KB) is required to be kept by all cattle keepers in Great Britain. This record may be kept as a manual or held electronically.

 


Fast Link >>
Minimize
Company brochure
Minimize

Insider Technologies Company BrochureDownload our Company Brochure and find out more about ITL - the team behind RTLX Reactor.





Regulation : (EC)No 1760/2000
Minimize

establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC)No 820/97REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine (cow, cattle) animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC)No 820/97 (80 KB)



ITL are a Microsoft Gold CERTIFIED Partner in Manchester, UK

Insider Technologies Limited are a DSPP HP Business Partner in Manchester, UK

Logica LAPS ( Logica All Payments System ) and ITL's Sentra Business Activity Monitoring ( BAM )

Thales e-Security - SafeSign Authentication Server ( SSAS) & Hp NonStop SRM Support

Latest ITL News
Minimize
RTLX Reactor reaches 3000 TPS for PCI DSS compliant ATM POS TLF PTLF monitoring and querying - Friday, April 27, 2012
RTLX Reactor now provides up to 3,000 TPS for header, auth and token extraction of BASE24 Classic TLF and PTLF transaction logs for monitoring, management information, querying and archiving of multiple years of ATM and POS data. On top of this, sensitive (P)TLF transaction fields, e.g. Primary Account Numbers (PAN), can be fully encrypted and masked in line with site PCI DSS directives, e.g. use AES_256 encryption. read more ...
Insider Technologies announces strategic partnership with Deep-Secure - Friday, September 10, 2010
ITL are pleased to announce that we will be working with Deep-Secure to monitor their Bastion and DeepSecure products. Deep-Secure provide a range of EAL4-assured data sharing solutions, not only in highly sensitive defence and intelligence environments but also to assist public and commercial organisations in maintaining privacy and confidentiality with sensitive information. read more ...
Standard Bank SA live with Logica LAPS and ITL's Sentra Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) software - Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Standard Bank of South Africa (SBSA) has gone live with Logica’s All Payments Solution (LAPS). The new system delivers a central payments processing hub and a risk and liquidity management system for its large-value Swift-based payments. As a key part of this new installation, SBSA has taken the LAPS Business Activity Monitor (BAM) tool. This Business intelligence (BI)-type solution is actually a third party enterprise application, delivered by UK-based vendor, Insider Technologies. read more ...
Insider Technologies are now a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner - ISV / Software Solutions - Thursday, December 31, 2009
Insider Technologies Limited (ITL) has been a Microsoft Certified Partner for a number of years and achieved Gold Partner status in 2009. As a Gold Certified Partner, ITL has demonstrated significant expertise with Microsoft technologies and proven ability to meet customers’ needs. read more ...

See more news stories...


  

keywords and phrases

base24 classic xpnet device handlers auth capture authorisation pos acquiring atm acquiring tandem hp nonstop servernet integrity blades trade blade equities stocks shares bond post-trade pre-settlement derivatives CFD futures CFD's options matching Real time trade matching and reporting of bonds, derivatives and equities rep trade matching monitoring trending and management reporting querying device handler customisation programmers programming hosting space for compilation, testing and development of HP NonStop Tandem NSK software host rent lease partition

COPE (Complete On-line Payments Environment) and STAR (SWIFT and TELEX Automated Routing)

Recent collaboration has seen Software Integrators enter the U.S. FedWire and CHIPS market together with alliance partner HP.

alternative to replacement for AO Enguard Vision replacement product

SWIFTNet FIN secure IP network

inter bank liquidity logica

securities hedges FX foreign exchange

replace transaction analyzer

flow star

fedwire

alternative to transaction analyzer

ibm websphere message broker wmb

cattle tagging

livestock movements

Software Integrators is a certified Fedwire Funds Service Vendor, having completed the Federal Reserve’s protocol certification process.

dotnetnuke manchester warrington preston lancashire web design london asp.net 2.0 software house bolton wigan greater manchester lancashire cheshire company website development and design develop business websites dotnetnuke

applications and networks such as SWIFT, FEDWIRE, Telex and Fax.

BASETRAN

The Generic Liquidity Manager and Payment Scheduler (GLiMPS) is a scheduling subsystem that can be fully integrated into STAR. It is configurable for use with High Value Payment Systems such as SWIFT's FIN-Copy service or Fedwire. It enables High Value Payments to be made at regular and controllable intervals according liquidity requirements.

transaction analyzer alternative

Local and foreign currency payments utilising the SWIFT network can be made by generating SWIFT payment advices within COPE and sending them out via STAR. Incoming local currency payments from SWIFT or Telex messages can be routed to COPE for payment by the most appropriate method. Local currency payments made over a national payment method, for example Fedwire or CHIPS for US dollars, are handled within COPE.

base24 classic xpnet device handlers auth capture authorisation pos acquiring atm acquiring

momi replacement

email tracking

transaction analyzer replacement

windows management

sla monitoring

momi alternative

capital tracks

sentra service console

alternative to momi

reflex 8020

payments tracking

multibatch

message tracking

messaging management

alternative to replacement for IBM Tivoli TEC HP Openview Operations Center BMC Performance Manager alternative replacement

exchange monitoring

windows management

  1. tailored software solutions
  2. tailored windows software solutions
  3. tailored nsk software solutions
  4. alternative to prognosis ir
  5. alternative to esq ao

alternative to payments manager software aci

aci payments manager replacement

  1. tailored linux software solutions
  2. tailored hp nonstop software solutions
  3. tailored tandem software solutions
  4. bespoke software solutions
  5. bespoke windows software solutions
  6. bespoke nsk software solutions
  7. bespoke linux software solutions
  8. bespoke hp nonstop software solutions
  9. bespoke tandem software solutions
  10. custom software solutions
  11. custom windows software solutions
  12. custom nsk software solutions
  13. custom linux software solutions
  14. custom hp nonstop software solutions
  15. custom tandem software solutions
  16. customised software solutions
  17. customised windows software solutions
  18. customised nsk software solutions
  19. customised linux software solutions
  20. customised hp nonstop software solutions
  21. customised tandem software solutions
  22. customized software solutions
  23. customized windows software solutions
  24. customized nsk software solutions
  25. customized linux software solutions
  26. customized hp nonstop software solutions
  27. customized tandem software solutions
  28. tailored PDA windows mobile PPC software solutions
  29. bespoke PDA windows mobile PPC software solutions
  30. custom PDA windows mobile PPC software solutions
  31. customised PDA windows mobile PPC software solutions
  32. customized PDA windows mobile PPC software solutions
  33. tailored software
  34. customised software
  35. customized software
  36. bespoke software
  37. custom software

nsk management

server management

windows management

tandem management

hp nonstop management

hp integrity blade management

bank holiday christmas eve xmas friday transaction payment message atm switch interchange pos tlf ptlf atd tdf volumes approvals denials timeouts disk contention monitoring analysis in real-time

base24-eps monitoring

base24 monitoring

base24 management

device handlers

base24-eps management

exchange management

manchester

programming

salford quays peel mediacityuk mediacity uk media city bovis nwda bbc university of salford mtv qvc mark whitfield timeline photos pictures latest webcam http://www.markwhitfield.net http://www.mawhitfield.com http://www.mawhitfield.com/mcuk.htm mark thompson

aleri atlas monitoring

tandem computers monitoring

xpnet management

xpnet monitoring

programmers

bespoke windows software development

 

  • custom windows software development
  • tailored windows software development
  • customised windows software development
  • customized windows software development

bespoke tandem software development

 

  • custom tandem software development
  • tailored tandem software development
  • customised tandem software development
  • customized tandem software development

bespoke hp nonstop software development

 

  • custom hp nonstop software development
  • tailored hp nonstop software development
  • customised hp nonstop software development
  • customized hp nonstop software development

bespoke windows mobile software development

 

  • custom windows mobile software development
  • tailored windows mobile software development
  • customised windows mobile software development
  • customized windows mobile software development

bespoke linux software development

 

  • custom linux software development
  • tailored linux software development
  • customised linux software development
  • customized linux software development

bespoke nsk software development

 

  1. custom nsk software development
  2. tailored nsk software development
  3. customised nsk software development
  4. customized nsk software development

open system services monitoring

 

  1. oss monitoring
  2. oss management
  3. open system services management

base24-eps xml monitoring

  • servernet monitoring
  • servernet management
  • ibm websphere mq monitoring and management
  • mq series monitoring and managment

MOMI is an affordable, easy-to-use Performance Monitor and Operations Utility.  This real-time tool developed and marketed by BlackWood Systems features OSS, Expand, History, Spooler GUI, EMS Viewer, FTP, MOMI Client Access control, SNTP and our optional Alarms function.  MOMI is used worldwide on HP NonStop Integrity and S-Series NSK platforms.

The Faster Payments initiative in the United Kingdom, mandated by the Payment Systems Task Force, aims to reduce clearing times on electronic payments between banks following telephone or Internet instructions from customers, as well as standing orders. The new clearing service will result in same-day or next-day clearing. To meet this requirement, organisations must implement a new payment scheme based on a near-real time processing model. The imperative is now upon banks to update their payment systems to enable a connection with the new Faster Payments central infrastructure. Banks must also complete testing within a very short time frame: Go-live deadlines are set for the end of 2007.BASE24-eps™ for Faster Payments
The BASE24-eps™ for Faster Payments Solution BASE24-eps for Faster Payments is a gateway that
allows existing bulk or high-value payment systems to support the Faster Payments initiative. The gateway includes functionality for connecting multiple payment initiation systems and internal routing of intra-bank
payments. It also supports APACS Standard 18 for standing order files. In addition, the gateway
monitors a bank’s settlement risk position and provides settlement reports to keep the bank informed
of its net settlement status. Decrease Implementation Time BASE24-eps for Faster Payments offers a
feature-rich gateway that links to the central Faster Payments infrastructure. The gateway easily integrates
into a bank’s existing payment systems, easing Faster Payments implementation. The solution has a flexible
and open architecture that can readily accommodate ISO 8583 and XML messages and other Faster
Payments-mandated requirements. With BASE24-eps for Faster Payments, banks may also tailor how
their Faster Payments transactions are processed using the solution’s powerful scripting facility.
The solution also interacts with multiple systems and platforms to bridge both retail and wholesale
transaction processing.

alternative to pna on nonstop


Reduce Costs

pna replacement

BASE24-eps for Faster Payments manages the transaction processing required for all payments. This functionality reduces changes to back-office applications and payment systems, and allows for
easy connections to the LINK and Voca central infrastructure. With minimal application changes and simple connections, banks can greatly reduce the overall costs and risks associated with Faster
Payments projects. Increase Flexibility
BASE24-eps for Faster Payments sends outbound payments and receives inbound payments.
It is continuously available and scalable, enabling banks to offer nonstop support to customers.
In addition, the gateway can be used by other organisations connected to the Faster Payments central
infrastructure, such as agencies and third-party beneficiaries.

 

The ACI Advantage BASE24-eps for Faster Payments is maintained by
ACI Worldwide and will be enhanced as the Faster Payments initiative changes and new mandates emerge.
The solution can also be used with several products in the ACI Payments Framework™.
The Faster Payments initiative in the United Kingdom, mandated by the Payment Systems
Task Force, aims to reduce clearing times on electronic payments between banks following
telephone or Internet instructions from customers, as well as standing orders. The new
clearing service will result in same-day or next-day clearing. To meet this requirement,
organisations must implement a new payment scheme based on a near-real time
processing model. The imperative is now upon banks to update their payment systems
to enable a connection with the new Faster Payments central infrastructure. Banks
must also complete testing within a very short time frame: Go-live deadlines are set
for the end of 2007.
These products include the ACI Money Transfer
System™ for a payments hub, ACI Proactive Risk
Manager™ for fraud detection and CORE360™
for electronic alerts and correspondence. Together,
these products can speed the implementation of a
comprehensive service for Faster Payments.
Components
BASE24-eps for Faster Payments consists of several
components, including the following:
Connectivity (e.g. MQ, IP)
Message formatting (e.g. internal to ISO 8583)
Message authentication
Network management
Timeout processing
Context management
Journal
Dispute investigation

replacement for netbatch software

Routing of unsolicited messages
Routing and authorisation services
Liquidity position monitoring
Experience, Expertise
Every second of every day, more than 800 customers
around the world rely on ACI solutions to process
payments, manage risk, automate back-office systems
and provide application infrastructure services. More
customers use ACI software to manage higher payment
volumes, of greater diversity, across more platforms
and geographies than any other provider in our field.

an alternative to prognosis software

Since 1975, ACI has provided software solutions to
the world’s innovators. We welcome the opportunity to
do the same for you.
All product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their
Central
Infrastructure
LINK/Voca
Direct
Corporate

an alternative to prognosis software

  • Access
  • Third-Party
  • Beneficiaries
  • Payer
  • Agency
  • Beneficiary
  • Agency

alternative to POS Transaction Analyzer (POS/TA) replacement executive dashboard is a best-of-breed solution designed to ensure continuous monitoring and management of POS transaction environments by detecting problems before they occur. The end result is high availability, higher profitability and greater customer satisfaction.

This out-of-the-box solution provides details about POS transactions processed and recorded in the POS Transaction Log file. It identifies traffic on all resource nodes defined in targeted logical networks. POS/TA is a web-based solution with a simple and friendly graphical user interface, and a secure architecture, providing you with a complete and effective POS transaction management system

alternative to ATM Transaction Analyzer (ATM/TA) replacement executive dashboard is a best-of-breed solution designed to ensure continuous monitoring and management of ATM transaction environments by detecting problems before they occur. The end result is high availability, higher profitability and greater customer satisfaction.

This out-of-the-box solution provides details about ATM transactions processed and recorded in the Transaction Log file. It identifies traffic on all resource nodes defined in targeted logical networks. ATM/TA is a web-based solution with a simple and friendly graphical user interface, and a secure architecture, providing you with a complete and effective ATM transaction management system.

replacing netbatch on hp nonstop

Gateway Gateway
Payer
Member
Gateway Beneficiary
Member

dotnetnuke manchester warrington preston lancashire web design london asp.net 2.0 software house bolton wigan greater manchester lancashire cheshire company website development and design develop business websites dotnetnuke

a replacement for automated operator software on hp nonstop

Gateway
Bank A
Retail
Customers
Corporate

automated operator replacement

Customers File
Bank B
The BASE24-eps for Faster Payments gateway is represented in the diagram below.

nsk management

nsk monitoring

  • windows mobile software development solutions
  • pda mobile software development solutions
  • cash hopper levels monitoring and management
  • cash vault levels monitoring and management

lancashire

manchester software solutions

Automated Operator (OpenNET/AO™)  replacement alternative
 
Operation Agents for NonStop (OpenNET/OVNM) 
 
OpenNET/Vision 
 
OpenNET/CP-Adapter 
 
OpenNET/T-Adapter  
 

dotnetnuke


OpenNET/ITS 
 
OpenCall Agent for NonStop (OpenNET/OCAN)

equities, bond and stock, share monitoring, levels and management

  • aciworldwide
  • automated operator alternative
  • uk bespoke software development and solutions
  • hp integrity monitoring and management
  • smartphone software development and solutions
  • dotnetnuke software development and solutions modules
  • dnn portal design and development
  • tandem hp nonstop netbatch replacement
  • netbatch software alternative
  • dotnetnuke website development
  • tandem hp nonstop prognosis replacement
  1. prognosis alternative
  2. tandem hp nonstop aci payments manager replacement
  3. payments manager alternative
  4. dnn website development and design
  5. ao replacement
  6. tandem hp nonstop ao replacement
  7. ao alternative
  8. dotnetnuke websites
  9. esq alternative
  10. tandem hp nonstop esq replacement
  11. esq software alternative
  12. custom bespoke tailored dotnetnuke dnn website design and development
  13.  
  14. alternative to ao on nonstop 

 dotnetnuke manchester warrington preston lancashire web design london asp.net 2.0 software house bolton wigan greater manchester lancashire cheshire company website development and design develop business websites dotnetnuke


Follow Insider Technologies Limited Twitter Account TweetsInsider Technologies Limited Spinnaker Court Chandlers Point 37 Broadway Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 2YR LinkedIn Company GroupJoin the Insider Technologies Limited Group on FacebookHome   |    Markets   |   Solutions   |   Products   |   Services   |   News & Events   |   Support   |   About Us   |   Location   |   Contact Us   |   Site Map   |   LinkedIn
Sentra for LAPS by Logica   |   Thales e-Security Support   |   Sentra for STAR by Software Integrators
   |   RTLX Reactor for BASE24 & eps by ACI Worldwide
RTLX Reactor is a registered trademark of Insider Technologies Limited

Privacy Statement  |  Terms Of Use
Copyright 2012 : Insider Technologies Limited, Manchester. M50 2YR (Near MediaCity UK BBC North ITV)